Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Keywords

Latest topics
» IEG Meeting February 8, 2016
Wed Jan 27, 2016 5:59 pm by Lorri Kat

» JPS/IEG Meeting February 1, 2016
Wed Jan 27, 2016 5:57 pm by Lorri Kat

» Jamestown Pride Society Public Meetings
Wed Jan 27, 2016 5:50 pm by Lorri Kat

» IEG Meeting February 8, 2016
Wed Jan 27, 2016 5:33 pm by Lorri Kat

» JPS/IEG Year Beginning Meeting
Wed Jan 27, 2016 5:19 pm by Lorri Kat

» Jamestown Pride Society Year Beginning Meeting
Wed Jan 13, 2016 6:34 pm by Lorri Kat

» IEG Meeting January 11th
Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:27 pm by Lorri Kat

» Introducing myself
Sat Nov 14, 2015 12:39 am by Lorri Kat

» Transgender Day of Remembrance Walk
Sat Nov 14, 2015 12:27 am by Lorri Kat

August 2017
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Calendar Calendar

Affiliates

free forum

Forumotion on Facebook Forumotion on Twitter Forumotion on YouTube Forumotion on Google+


After Hobby Lobby, Seven Top LGBT And Civil Rights Orgs Drop Support For ENDA

View previous topic View next topic Go down

After Hobby Lobby, Seven Top LGBT And Civil Rights Orgs Drop Support For ENDA

Post by Lorri Kat on Tue Jul 08, 2014 8:09 pm

UPDATED: After Hobby Lobby, Seven Top LGBT And Civil Rights Orgs Drop Support For ENDA


http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/breaking_after_hobby_lobby_six_top_lgbt_and_civil_rights_orgs_drop_support_for_enda

by David Badash
July 08, 2014 4:59 PM


Six of the nation's top LGBT and civil rights organizations today have announced they are withdrawing support for ENDA after the Supreme Court's Hobby Lobby ruling.
Change the conversation, change the world
Share this =UPDATED: After Hobby Lobby, Seven Top LGBT And Civil Rights Orgs Drop Support For ENDA - The New Civil Rights Movement&p[summary]=After Hobby Lobby, Six Top LGBT And Civil Rights Orgs Drop Support For ENDA&p[url==http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/breaking_after_hobby_lobby_six_top_lgbt_and_civil_rights_orgs_drop_support_for_enda&p[images][0]=http://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/thenewcivilrightsmovement/pages/10572/meta_images/original/ENDA3.jpg?1404853720]]=http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/breaking_after_hobby_lobby_six_top_lgbt_and_civil_rights_orgs_drop_support_for_enda&p[images][0]=http://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/thenewcivilrightsmovement/pages/10572/meta_images/original/ENDA3.jpg?1404853720]
After 40 years, the LGBT community in part has decided that not only is ENDA not good enough, it's potentially dangerous because the legislation contains strong carve outs for religious organizations. In the wake of the Supreme Court's Hobby Lobby ruling, ENDA could become a license to discriminate rather than the legal protection it was designed to be.
In a dramatic move today, the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force announced it was dropping support for the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. Hours later, a coalition of five LGBT legal and civil rights groups -- the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Lambda Legal, the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR), and the Transgender Law Center -- made a similar announcement.
The coalition of five groups calls their request "a simple one."
UPDATE: HRC Charts Lone Course, Reiterates Support For ENDA Despite Religious Exemptions
"Do not give religiously affiliated employers a license to discriminate against LGBT people when they have no such right to discriminate based on race, sex, national origin, age, disability, or genetic information," the group say in a joint statement just released. "Religiously affiliated organizations are allowed to make hiring decisions based on their religion, but nothing in federal law authorizes discrimination by those organizations based on any other protected characteristic, and the rule should be the same for sexual orientation and gender identity or expression. Religious organizations are free to choose their ministers or faith leaders, and adding protections for sexual orientation and gender identity or expression will not change that."
They say their "concerns are not hypothetical" and that "the American people oppose efforts to misuse religious liberty as an excuse to discriminate against LGBT people."
Increasingly, this is what employment discrimination against LGBT people looks like. Take the example of Matthew Barrett.  In July 2013, Matthew was offered a job as food services director at Fontbonne Academy, a college prep high school in Milton, Massachusetts that is affiliated with the Roman Catholic Sisters of St. Joseph of Boston.  Fontbonne Academy has employees and admits students of various faiths. Yet, two days after Matthew listed his husband as his emergency contact on the standard employment paperwork, and despite twenty years of work in the food services industry, his job offer was rescinded.  Although nothing about the food services job involved religious rituals or teaching, Matthew was told by an administrator that the school was unable to hire him because “the Catholic religion doesn’t recognize same-sex marriage.” The current version of ENDA would authorize this sexual orientation discrimination.
The groups add that until the "discriminatory exemption is removed so that anti-LGBT discrimination is treated the same as race, sex, national origin, age, disability, or genetic information under federal workplace laws," they think "ENDA should not move forward in Congress."
That request will likely be granted, as Speaker John Boehner has stated he believes LGBT people -- as do the majority of Americans, wrongly -- are already protected and can't be fired for being LGBT. Boehner refuses to bering ENDA for a vote.
"In addition," the coalition states, "we will oppose any similar provisions at the state and local level.  We are hopeful that the many members of Congress who support this historic, critically important legislation will agree that singling out LGBT people for an unequal and unfair exemption from basic workplace protection falls unacceptably short of the civil rights standards that have served our nation well against other types of discrimination for fifty years.  We stand ready and eager to work with them to achieve the long-sought goal of explicit, effective federal non-discrimination protections for LGBT people."
Rea Carey, Executive Director, Task Force Action Fund, adds:
"The campaign to create broad religious exemptions for employment protections repeats a pattern we¹ve seen before in methodically undermining voting rights, women¹s access to reproductive health and affirmative action. It is time for fair minded people to block this momentum, rather than help speed it into law. We need new federal non-discrimination legislation that contains a reasonable religious accommodation. LGBT people should have the same protections as those contained in Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Legal equality is legal equality."
avatar
Lorri Kat
Admin

Posts : 119
Join date : 2014-06-26
Location : Jamestown, NY

View user profile http://identityexpression.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: After Hobby Lobby, Seven Top LGBT And Civil Rights Orgs Drop Support For ENDA

Post by Lorri Kat on Tue Jul 08, 2014 8:16 pm

ENDA Religious Exemption - Fact Sheet
The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) includes a broad exemption for religious organizations. ENDA’s religious exemption recognizes that the U.S. Constitution protects certain employment decisions of religious organizations and that some religious organizations may have a specific and significant religious reason to make employment decisions, even those that take an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity into account. It also acknowledges that gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) employees of religious organizations should be aware that they could lose their jobs, even jobs that do not serve a clearly religious function, because of sexual orientation or gender identity.
The exemption consists of three parts:

  • A complete exemption for houses of worship, parochial and similar religious schools, and missions
  • A codification of the so-called “ministerial exemption” recognized by many federal courts, exempting positions at religious organizations that involve the teaching or spreading religion, religious governance, or the supervision of individuals engaged in these activities
  • A provision allowing religious organizations, for classes of jobs, to require employees and applicants to conform to a declared set of significant religious tenets, including ones which would bar LGBT people from holding the position

In the third section of the exemption, the declaration of an employer’s significant tenets is not subject to judicial review and is only applicable in proceedings under ENDA.
In practice, this language continues to exempt many jobs with religious organizations. Under the first section of the exemption, for example, a priest or minister is clearly exempt, as well as the church secretary and the administrator of Sunday School programs. Under the second paragraph, the chaplain at a religiously-affiliated hospital and the teacher of canon law at a religious university are also exempt.
Under the third part of the exemption, a religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society may decide to apply its religious tenets to classes of employees. Although this provision gives, as most courts would give, deference to religious organizations in declaring significant religious tenets, it means that ENDA will apply to some positions but not others at these employers. For example, a religiously-affiliated hospital could choose to require all nurses to follow a declared set of significant religious tenets, including avoiding same-sex sexual activity, and be able to terminate a male nurse who they subsequently learn is in a relationship with another man. Similarly, a social services agency run by a religious sect could require its executive director to subscribe to a set of tenets that it declares significant, including one that bars LGBT people from holding the job, but choose not impose the same requirement on its social workers or other classes of employees 

http://www.civilrights.org/lgbt/enda/religious-exemption.html
avatar
Lorri Kat
Admin

Posts : 119
Join date : 2014-06-26
Location : Jamestown, NY

View user profile http://identityexpression.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum